Telling the Truth About History Essay

Jessica Baeza

March 17, june 2006

History 281

Journal Job #3

Post-Modernity and Its Results on Historic Writings

The struggle to get truth in telling the stories of the past has been a method to obtain constant argument amongst historians and intellectuals. With the emergence of religious being rejected during the 17th and eighteenth century Enlightenment, the impact and undoubted supremacy of the heroic type of science provided historians with new ways pertaining to obtaining truth—absolute truths—through the dispassionate sight of a " heroic” observer. Although this remains unchallenged for many decades, with the social changes and the democratization of education, thinking about an absolute truth—a universal tale of nationwide progress which will neglects to encompass the diversity of America—is questioned by post-modernity. In all its pessimisms towards complete truths and objective understanding, post-modernism shows the importance of and pieces the foundation to get questioning historic accuracy and the idea of objectivity. Can there be real truth when the words and language of the " objective” viewer is inadvertently dripping in their own personal, cultural, and political agendas? Throughout the works of Foucault and Deerdas, who also get at the heart of the very problem, historians ought to reject the Enlightenment job, and look much deeper into famous evidence to interrogate the structure and organization with the text, its vocabulary, and hidden presumptions. Although, post-modernity—a critique from the Enlightenment ideals—creates the structure for the questioning of historical precision, it is very important to realize its lack of ability to make its own solutions to this historical dilemma. Fortunately, with the making it ideas of practical realists, there is a perception of wish and positive outlook for the future of history and the all-encompassing truths it can uphold.

How do post-modernity obstacle the brave model of technology and enlightenment...